The deal would mean single men who arrive in Kent on small boats could be flown 4,000 miles on a one-way ticket to Rwanda while their case is considered.
It would “deal a major blow” to people smugglers, according to Home Secretary Priti Patel, but the plans have been criticized as inhumane and even racist.
Nicola Sturgeon condemned the scheme as “despicable” and “shameful”, while the Scottish Refugee Council said it would “breach international law”.
It comes after at least 27 people died in November 2021 when a boat sank while attempting to cross the English Channel from France.
Among those who drowned were three children, seven women – including a pregnant woman – and 17 men, in what has been named the biggest loss of life in the Channel since records began.
The tragedy has sparked an outpouring of concern and anger about the issue.
But why do people risk their lives to make this dangerous journey?
Why are people crossing the English Channel from France in migrant boats?
In 2021, at least 28,000 people attempted the perilous journey across the busiest shipping lane in the world. And so far in 2022, more than 4,000 people are reported to have attempted it.
There are many factors driving this. Some are fleeing war-torn countries like Afghanistan. Others face persecution in their home country.
Ninety-eight per cent of those who successfully cross the Channel to the UK claim asylum here.
The Refugee Council says: “Behind every single person that needlessly lost their life last night will be a person who was looking for safety, for protection and who had hope of a new life that now will never be realized.”
Why don’t migrants and refugees stay in France?
Some people argue migrants wanting to get to the UK should simply stay in France, another safe country.
But the issue is more complicated than that, and there are many reasons why people want to travel to the UK.
First of all, the European Court of Human Rights has previously condemned France for “inhumane and degrading living conditions” of homeless asylum seekers.
Secondly, those who are trying to seek asylum here in the UK often have ties to the country. For example, they may have served with our military, have family members who live here, or speak the language.
Due to our colonial history and our more recent intervention in conflicts around the globe, many argue the UK has a responsibility to do its part and take in refugees.
There are more than 26.2 million refugees around the world, according to the Refugee Council. Though refugees do not have to claim asylum in the first ‘safe’ country they reach, 85 per cent of the world’s refugees are in developing countries.
By comparison, Germany received 127,730 applications in the same period and France received 96,510.
Is it illegal for asylum seekers to cross the English Channel?
There is no such thing as an illegal asylum seeker, and it is not illegal to enter the UK to claim asylum.
Under international law, anyone has the right to apply for asylum in any country.
The UN Refugee Convention also recognizes people fleeing persecution may have to use irregular means to escape and claim asylum in another country, and they cannot be penalized for doing so.
It is also a requirement under International Maritime Law for states to rescue people in trouble at sea.
What is illegal is people smuggling – four suspected traffickers have been arrested following the incident on Wednesday.
What are the UK and French Governments doing about Channel crossings?
Among the proposals, it would consider whether someone arrived in the UK “legally or illegally” when deciding whether to grant them asylum. It will also consider “pushing” boats back to France.
The United Nations Refugee Agency has criticized the proposed bill, saying it “would penalize most refugees seeking asylum in the country, creating an asylum model that undermines established international refugee protection rules”.
And the UK Government’s own assessment of the proposed policies admitted there is a risk that increased security and deterrence could encourage migrants to “attempt riskier means” of entering the UK.
The French have rejected this idea, with Calais MP Pierre-Henri Dumont saying it “wouldn’t work”.
He said: “I’m not sure that having more police officers or more materials on the French shore will help to stop these crossings because we have 200 or 300 kilometers of shore to monitor 24/7.
“It only takes five to 10 minutes to take a boat and put it at sea filled with migrants.”
A message from the Editor:
Thank you for reading this article. We’re more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by Coronavirus impacts our advertisers.
If you haven’t already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription.