Teacher left on crutches after being beaten up by five-year-old wins £140,000 payout


Aleksandra Aukettwas traumatized and suffered multiple injuries when “punched, pinched and kicked” by the reception class child in 2017 while trying to keep order

aleksandra aukett
Aleksandra Aukett has been left on crutches

An infants’ school teaching assistant left on crutches after she was beaten up by a five-year-old has won a £140,000 compensation payout after suing her bosses.

Aleksandra Aukett, 44, was traumatized and suffered multiple soft tissue injuries when “punched, pinched and kicked” by the “big for his age” reception class child in 2017 while trying to keep order.

Ms Aukett, who stepped up to the witness box at Central London County Court using crutches, says she has been left with “life-changing” chronic pain and has not returned to work due to a fear of going back to the “school environment” in the aftermath of her order.

This week, she sued the London Borough of Hillingdon, the local authority responsible for overseeing the school, claiming more should have been done to protect her in the workplace.

Today, on the second day of a planned three-day trial, the council agreed to settle the case, handing Ms Aukett £140,338 compensation, as well as paying her lawyers’ bills.

Earlier, her barrister, Gemma Witherington, told Judge Richard Roberts: “Ms Aukett was acting in the course of her employment when she was attacked by a child known as X.

Aleksandra Aukett is suing over school attack



“He had attacked another child and she removed the other children from the room to safety when X launched himself at her in the corridor and punched her in the chest and pinched her.

“He then kicked her in the hip and groin and legs.

Ms Aukett told the court she still has a lump and swelling around her hip from the attack and has yet to return to work.

The boy – described as big for his age – caused soft tissue injuries to her lower back, chest and left buttock as well as long-term inflammation.

Medical experts for Ms Aukett said she was resilient and cheerful before the classroom assault, but is now plagued by chronic back pain, PTSD and depression.

“I’m still restricted,” she said from the witness box.

“I’m nowhere near the level of mobility, fitness and health I was at before the accident.”

Royal Courts of Justice in London


Getty Images/iStockphoto)

Her barrister said the child who went for Ms Aukett had learning difficulties and a “vulnerable background” and said her client fully accepted this.

“But this was a very nasty assault which had physical and mental health consequences for her,” she added.

None of her colleagues had warned her about the lad’s “violent tendencies,” claimed Ms Witherington.

The unruly youngster had a record for “physically assaulting other pupils and staff”, said the barrister, adding: “it was reasonably foreseeable that this child would seriously injure either another pupil or one of the teachers”.

“If Ms Aukett had known about X’s condition/behaviour and/or had relevant training, then it was more likely than not that she could have steps taken to avoid the attack,” she told the court.

In particular she would have been far more cautious going out into the corridor to calm the youngster and would have ensured there was “more support.”

Lawyers for the London Borough of Hillingdon claimed Ms Aukett had been trained in how to restrain pupils and de-escalate incidents.

And council barrister Roderick Abbott said it did everything in its power to safeguard staff and pupils from any risk posed.

He highlighted a specific pupil risk assessment carried out on the five-year-old which pinpointed a risk of potential hazards, including “throwing items and risk of injury to staff or other pupils”.

“This clearly identifies the risk of X being violent towards staff and pupils,” he argued.

Ms Witherington denied the claims that “everybody knew about it at the school.”

But Mr Abbott told the judge that given the school’s general awareness of the boy’s stormy history it would have been “impossible for Ms Aukett to be unaware of X’s behaviour”.

He accepted that Ms Aukett was “the victim of a violent attack while doing a difficult job” but denied that the school failed in its duty to safeguard her.

However, after a day of evidence before the judge and negotiations outside court, the council today agreed to settle the case by paying Ms Aukett over £140,000 compensation, as well as her lawyers’ bills.

Judge Roberts commented: “The parties are to be commended.

“Well, Ms Aukett, bringing a law claim is very difficult and proving cases is very difficult, but you’ve done that, so well done.”

Speaking afterwards, Ms Aukett said she was “looking forward to opening a new chapter in my life”.
“It’s been horrendous,” she added, labeling the assault on her “completely life-changing.”

Read More

Read More


See also  'Inadequate' nursery 'left children in dark rooms with no access to fresh water'

Related Posts

George Holan

George Holan is chief editor at Plainsmen Post and has articles published in many notable publications in the last decade.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.