Their courage and determination to fight the Russian warmongers is inspiring and, perhaps more so, is the example of their president Volodymyr Zelensky, who has been an absolute revelation. He has remained in their midst of him, he has given energetic support to his troops and civilians alike and has garnered backing from practically every nation in the western world.
It set me thinking as to how we Scots would react in a similar predicament when we have an SNP First Minister who has split our nation in two and is determined, no matter the consequences, to drag 50 per cent of our people down a path they do not want to go for a messianic, unrealistic idea of splitting us away from Great Britain.
We’d be in a “life or death” quagmire, being outside Nato (the SNP’s stated ambition) and nuclear free (same), similar to Ukraine, just not patriotic thanks to divisions caused by SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon, whose word would lack sincerity judged on her past evasiveness.
Stan Hogarth, Strathaven, South Lanarkshire
Having watched many of President Zelensky’s speeches and interviews, it’s hard not to conclude that playing a president in a TV program is by far a better training ground for the role than the usual political route taken by other national leaders. Any plans for a UK TV series?
Richard Perry, Burntisland, Fife
Here are some facts that undermine the assertions in Les Reid’s letter of 11 April. There is a Scotland/England border, which was established in the 1237 Treaty of York, and has remained broadly unchanged. It demarcates two legal jurisdictions, and the separate Law Societies of Scotland and of England (and Wales) exist because of this border.
The Office for National Statistics gives the land masses of England and Scotland as 50,301 and 30,090 square miles respectively, so Scotland’s “independent stage” would hardly be small. Scotland has a population similar to that of Norway, Finland and Denmark, and, like these medium-size countries, would join “a united response” to climate change. Whitelee Wind Farm will still produce renewable energy in an independent Scotland.
Les Reid does not define Scotland’s deficit – or source his claim that Scotland spends far more than it raises in tax. In contrast, Professor David Simpson, Founding Director of the Fraser of Allander Institute, stated on 22 January 2022 the following. “Everywhere else in the world, including the UK, the term ‘fiscal deficit’ means a shortfall in the revenue of a Government compared to its expenditure. If Scotland’s fiscal balance was compiled according to recognized standards of national accounting, then the expenditure side of the balance would show expenditure by the Scottish Government. Since the Scottish Government is obliged by the devolution settlement always to balance its budget, Scotland’s fiscal deficit in the proper sense of that term is zero every year.”
E Campbell, Newton Mearns, East Renfrewshire
Ukraine conflict: Volodymyr Zelensky says next few days of war are crucial
Neil Anderson claims mask wearing is “a proven protection against Covid” (Letters, 11 April). I am wondering where he is getting his information from. A Belgian 2021 study examined the accumulation of bacteria on masks, determined the best cleaning routine and surveyed wearers on their mask habits. Here are some of their results.
After four hours of use 43 per cent of bacterial colonies on the masks were resistant to widely-used antibiotics.
The best mask cleaning methods were boiling, ironing with a steam iron or washing at 60 degrees C with detergent. Cleaning should be done daily as a minimum.
In a survey of 25,000 participants only 21 per cent of respondents reported cleaning their cotton face masks daily, 27 per cent washed them weekly and 6 per cent never washed them at all. Only 8 per cent of surgical mask users threw them away after each use, and 15 per cent only threw them away if they were visibly damaged or dirty. Some 36 per cent had a health complaint when wearing a mask.
Geoff Moore, Alness, Highland
Someone should tell Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak there’s more to ethical behavior and integrity than following the rules: obviously, following the rules is the least we can expect of someone in his government position, but I think we should be able to expect quite a bit more.
We know that Easter derives its name from Spring goddess Eostre and involves many different images of rebirth, including an egg-laying bunny! Christian religious believers engage with the spirit of the season by celebrating the Jesus resurrection story.
In October Greg Knight MP pressed the UK government to implement the Easter Act 1928 and fix the date of the Easter public holidays. Despite the fact this would allow better planning for children, families and businesses, the government did not think it would be “suitable” to fix the dates “without input and agreement from the Church (of England) or other Christian Bodies”.
The religious minority interpretation of the festival is quite legitimate but the ancient dispute about its liturgical date should not be privileged at the expense of working families.
They’re at it again. Edinburgh Council has a grand plan for getting us all to abandon our cars and “walk, wheel and cycle” around the city. They aim to create on George IV Bridge the kind of massive snarl-up that has been perpetrated in Forrest Road. I’m not sure how many cyclists used the dedicated cycle lanes when they were in force on George IV Bridge, but cyclists will now have a segregated track all to themselves.
The artist’s impression I have seen of the plan shows pavement, two-way cycle track and then a track with the occasional bench to support the weary traveler who is trying to cross the road. Only after that is there actual road, and then another pavement. The area of road is totally unrealistic: it has a smooth and uniform surface without the many patches and potholes to which the long-suffering public is now accustomed. It also shows people waiting at a bus stop that the council took out of use many months ago.
I wouldn’t dream of taking my car into town now, but I do travel into town by bus. It is the bus service that will pay the price for this harebrained scheme – and that means drivers as well as passengers. Edinburgh is a city of narrow streets and many buses. The council’s plans to anathematize cars, privilege cyclists and reduce road capacity is also a direct attack on those who use public transport. Bus journey times are lengthening because the infrastructure works against public transport.
This may or may not be the council’s objective; after all, they favor “walking, wheeling and cycling”, with no mention of public transport. The message is: you had better be young and fit if you want to get around central Edinburgh.
Jill Stephenson, Edinburgh
Politicians and media are currently correctly occupied by the invasion of Ukraine by the Czar Putin’s regime.
However, this April marks the fourth year since more than 300 Nicaraguan civilian people were shot and killed by the Ortega/Murillo government police and their paramilitary supporters. This is more obviously relevant when you realize that the Ortega regime is one of the few that supports the Putin regime.
There are currently 181 political prisoners in Nicaragua, a country with a population size similar to Scotland. In February this year, one prisoner, 73-year-old Hugo Torres, died in captivity when denied medical treatment for chronic ailments.
We should tell our Westminster MPs to put pressure on the Foreign and Commonwealth office to increase sanctions against Ortega’s repressive regime so it stops killing Nicaraguan peasants and workers.
Norman Lockhart, Scottish Borders
Steuart Campbell wonders what happens when the tides turn and there is no electricity being generated (Letters, 8 April).
Well, the batteries having been charged up, the electricity continues to flow to the grid. The same applies to solar and wind generated power, also; for that matter, motor cars go for some distance after a charge.
When will the Greens and the engineering and technically challenged critics realize that you just cannot close all fossil-fueled power stations, without a viable replacement.
A phased strategy is required to keep bills down and for everyone to continue to enjoy a reliable and secure power supply. In recognizing this fact we should all be supporting the efficient combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT) gas-fired power stations which are 60 per cent less polluting than their coal cousins, and this interim strategy should include tidal and hydro generation schemes.
If fracking is introduced then there is absolutely no reason why your energy bill should not tumble – let your voice be heard, dear reader, and lobby your political representative.
Finally, it is utterly folly to continue with wind, solar and nuclear fission, but why is the government keeping very quiet about the potential of electricity from space and that of nuclear fusion, the Holy Grail of power production?
Dave Haskell, Cardigan, Ceredigion
We welcome your thoughts. Write to [email protected] including name, address and phone number – we won’t print full details. Keep letters under 300 words, with no attachments, and avoid ‘Letters to the Editor/Readers’ Letters’ or similar in your subject line. If referring to an article, include date, page number and heading.
A message from the Editor
Thank you for reading this article. We’re more reliant on your support than ever as the shift in consumer habits brought about by coronavirus impacts our advertisers. If you haven’t already, please consider supporting our trusted, fact-checked journalism by taking out a digital subscription. Click on this link for more information.