Pregnant woman wins £15,000 payout after boss said she ‘must have been having fun lately’


A mum-to-be received a payout of £15,000 after her boss joked about her pregnancy before telling her she was sacked.

Bianca King, a mortgage administrator, told company director George Dodds that she was expecting a baby to which he replied that she “must have been having fun lately”, a court heard.

Mr Dodds then told her she was being sacked before withdrawing the dismissal when she told him about taking maternity leave, Northants Live reports.

Over the following months, Ms King was subjected to a barrage of upset after Mr Dodds started shouting at her – in one incident even leaving her in tears after criticizing her in front of colleagues on a video conference call.

Due to Mr Dodds’ treatment of her, Ms King succumbed to stress before the birth of her first child and visited her GP for anxiety, it was said.

The court ruled she was the victim of pregnancy discrimination and awarded her £15,009.84 in compensation.

The hearing, held in Cambridge, was told Ms King worked as a processing clerk for Mr Dodds’ Northampton-based firm Mortgage Compare from September 2016.

In October 2018, she sent an e-mail to Mr Dodds, informing him she was pregnant and her baby was going to be born in early March 2019.



Ms King was awarded £15,000 after her boss made a joke about her pregnancy

The court heard Mr Dodds requested a meeting with Ms King at the office in December 2018, at which he gave her a letter stating she was to be “laid off with immediate effect”.

See also  PS5 UK stock - live: latest Game restocking news, Smyths, Currys and more

Mr Dodds told her the company was having some financial difficulties and could not continue “to keep her” but no other employee was given such information.

He then took the letter back when she said she would be going on maternity leave in four months, saying “that changes everything. I did not know it was so soon”, the court heard.

Employment Judge Martin Bloom said: “It is evident…that the threat of laying off [Ms King] was only made to her as a result of her notification… that she was pregnant.”

In December 2018, Ms King sent an email to Mr Dodds making reference to the letter and her belief she was “being discriminated against” due to her pregnancy status.

The court heard Mr Dodds then started criticizing Ms King.

He accused her of not sending emails and shouted at her on various occasions, the court heard.

Judge Bloom noted: “This form of behavior directed to [Ms King] by Mr Dodds had not been in evidence prior to [her] pregnancy. On one such occasion [she] was so upset she had to leave a group video call and went to the toilet in tears.”

In January 2019, Ms King met with Mr Dodds to discuss her request to take her 2019 holiday entitlement before she went on maternity leave. Mr Dodds agreed but referred to her request for her as “cheeky”.

The court heard when Ms King returned to work at the end of January 2019 her computer was shut down, she was denied access to all systems and told she was “not required to work”.

See also  Russia business deals muddy GOP US Senate primary in Ohio

She was required to sit around for several hours before being allowed to go home. In February 2019, Ms King tried to contact Mr Dodds about her non-payment of her maternity pay but her requests “were largely ignored”.

In April 2019, Mr Dodds told Ms King all employees would be converted to “self-employed status”.

The court heard she e-mailed Mr Dodds asking for more information only to receive a reply which stated: “This doesn’t surprise me. You have been looking for a way to accuse us of this (the termination of her employment) for months .”

Ms King never returned to work for Mr Dodds, the court heard.

Judge Bloom said: “These acts of unfavorable treatment were carried out by [Mr Dodds] because [Ms King] had advised them that she was pregnant and due to take and subsequently did take maternity leave.

“No lawful or indeed any plausible alternative exists for that treatment. We have taken note of the fact that [Ms King] was extremely distressed by the events.

“Her pregnancy was her first pregnancy and she had been very much looking forward to the birth of her child. [She] was undoubtedly not only upset by the events but became stressed.

“Eventually she had to see her General Practitioner and was prescribed medication for anxiety and stress.

“At a time when she ought to have been looking forward to the birth of her child, she had to deal with the events… and a subsequent deterioration in her health.”

See also  Preview: Leeds United vs Manchester United

Don’t miss the latest news from around Scotland and beyond – Sign up to our daily newsletter here.




www.dailyrecord.co.uk

Related Posts

George Holan

George Holan is chief editor at Plainsmen Post and has articles published in many notable publications in the last decade.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.