Homeless charity criticizes Government over proposed ends for beggars



Campaigners have criticized the Government for proposing to continue handing fines to beggars as it consults on replacing an “antiquated” law.

Earlier this year, the Government pledged to repeal the Vagrancy Act – in place since 1824 – which includes fines of up to £1,000 and a criminal record for rough sleeping or begging.

The Department for Leveling-Up, Housing, and Communities on Thursday launched a consultation to replace the act, previously branded “antiquated” by the former secretary of state Robert Jenrick.

The Government has proposed possibly retaining a £200 fine for begging as it consults on replacing the Vagrancy Act (Yui Mok/PA)

(PA Archive)

But the chief executive of the homeless charity Crisis, Matt Downie, said the new proposal – which still includes possible ends of £200 for beggars – “doesn’t really take us forward”.

He told the PA news agency: “In our experience, it’s completely counterproductive and in many cases cruel to be issuing people with fines to be begging.

“And how are they expected to find the money to pay such ends. It’s always quite ludicrous.

“So we really don’t think that people should be criminalized simply for being destitute and begging – and for us the only instance where that’s at all appropriate is if there’s additional harassment or anti-social behavior in which case the existing legislation completely covers what’s needed.

“And so I think the Government’s idea of ​​continuing to fine people doesn’t really take us forward from the Vagrancy Act which they have agreed to abolish.”

He said in an earlier statement we “cannot replace one punitive legislation with another targeting people on the streets” and expressed concern the proposals were “far too wide” and could lead to people being punished instead of given help.

“Instead of focusing on measures that may further penalize people on the streets, the Government must instead look at how it can encourage a multi-agency approach.”

The consultation document highlights two case studies which it says outlines how ends “ineffective deterrents” and can be “counterproductive”, with many police forces only seeking to use the current act as a “last resort”, but still goes on to propose the lesser £200 fine.

The fine, it said, could be retained in new legislation as the maximum penalty for “minor begging offences”.

It added serious offences, including those involving exploitation, may require harsher penalties.

Types of harmful begging specified in the consultation include persistent begging, or begging in locations such as transport hubs, entrances to businesses, cash points, or by approaching stopped cars in traffic, as well as fraudulent begging, more than one person begging in an organized way, or begging involving exploitation and coercion.

Rough Sleeping and Housing Minister Eddie Hughes MP said: “No-one should be criminalized simply for having nowhere to live, and it is right that we repeal the outdated Vagrancy Act.

“We must balance our role in providing essential support for vulnerable people with ensuring that we do not weaken the ability of police to protect communities.”


www.independent.co.uk

See also  Six arrests after Extinction Rebellion occupy Shell oil tanker

Related Posts

George Holan

George Holan is chief editor at Plainsmen Post and has articles published in many notable publications in the last decade.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.