Factbox: Who was Jimmy Savile and what did PM Johnson claim about Labor leader?


Athletics – BUPA Great North Run – Newcastle – 10/1/06 Jimmy Saville at the race Mandatory Credit: Action Images / Lee Smith

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

LONDON, Feb 8 (Reuters) – British Prime Minister Boris Johnson is facing demands to withdraw remarks he made about Keir Starmer after he falsely accused the opposition Labor leader of failing to prosecute late sex offender Jimmy Savile.

Protesters mobbed Starmer near parliament on Monday, with some shouting Savile’s name at him. read more

Johnson made his comments last month while he was being questioned by Starmer over an official report into parties at the prime minister’s residence and office during lockdown. Starmer called on Johnson to resign and Johnson, whose leadership is under threat, hit back.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Here are details on the row.

WHO WAS JIMMY SAVILE?

Savile was one of Britain’s biggest TV stars in the 1970s and 1980s, and he was knighted by then Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher. He was revealed to be the country’s worst ever sex offender following his death in 2011, aged 84.

A police-led report found he had sexually assaulted hundreds of victims, mainly children, over six decades of abuse including rapes and even at a hospice treating terminally ill patients. The youngest victim was aged eight.

WHY IS STARMER LINKED?

Starmer was the Director of Public Prosecutions in 2007 and 2008 when police carried out investigations into Savile while he was still alive.

See also  Returning Spring Breakers rescue father and daughter from Indiana car wreck

The Crown Prosecution Service decided not to prosecute Savile and after his death Starmer ordered an inquiry into the CPS involvement.

The inquiry found, while Savile might have been prosecuted if police and the CPS had taken a different approach, there was no improper motive for the decision not to prosecute. It made no reference to Starmer having any involvement in that decision. Starmer later apologized for the CPS’s failings.

JOHNSON’S SMEAR

On Jan. 31, as Johnson faced angry lawmakers in parliament following the publication of a critical report by into alcohol-fueled parties at Downing Street during coronavirus lockdowns, he raised the link between Savile and Starmer after the Labor leader called for his resignation.

Johnson said: “… That is because the report does absolutely nothing to substantiate the tissue of nonsense that he has just spoken — absolutely nothing.

“Instead, this Leader of the Opposition, a former Director of Public Prosecutions — although he has spent most of his time prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile, as far as I can make out — chose to use this moment continually to prejudge a police inquiry.”

STARMER RESPONSE

The Savile barb provoked anger not only from opposition lawmakers but also from members of Johnson’s own Conservative Party who said he should withdraw the remark and apologise.

Starmer said the accusation was a slur peddled by right-wing trolls, a reference to the accusation having previously appeared on some social media sites along with the allegation he had protected paedophiles as DPP.

In parliament, he accused Johnson of “parroting the conspiracy theories of violent fascists.”

See also  Average price tag on a home rockets by nearly £8,000 in February

Johnson declined to apologize and said: “I am informed that in 2013 he apologized and took full responsibility for what had happened on his watch, and I think that was the right thing to do.”

CLARIFICATION

On Feb. 3 as he continued to face questions about the issue, Johnson told an interviewer he wanted to “clarify” his remarks.

“I want to be very clear about this because a lot of people have got very hot under the collar and I understand why.

“Let’s be absolutely clear. I’m talking not about the Leader of the Opposition’s personal record when he was DPP and I totally understand that he had nothing to do personally with those decisions,” Johnson said.

“I was making a point about his responsibility for the organization as a whole and I think people can see that and I just really do want to clarify that because it is it is important.”

His clarification failed to satisfy opponents or critics in his own party. Munira Mirza, her head of policy and one of her closest aides, quit her post saying the remarks were a “scurrilous accusation” and “an inappropriate and partisan reference to a horrendous case of child sex abuse.”

Finance minister Rishi Sunak said: “I wouldn’t have said it, and I am glad the prime minister clarified what he said.”

STARMER HOUNDED

On Monday, Starmer was hounded by a group of anti-vaccination protesters as he walked near parliament, some of whom shouted references to Savile and the slur that he had protected paedophiles.

Johnson called what happened “absolutely disgraceful.” But Labor politicians and about 10 Conservative lawmakers linked the incident to his earlier remarks about him.

See also  Rape Crisis Scotland: Podcast featuring sexual assault and rape survivors launched to encourage public conversation and better understanding

“Let’s stop this drift towards a Trumpian style of politics from becoming the norm. We are better than this,” Tobias Ellwood, the Conservative chairman of parliament’s defense committee, said.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Reporting by Michael Holden; editing by Guy Faulconbridge and Angus MacSwan

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.


www.reuters.com

Related Posts

George Holan

George Holan is chief editor at Plainsmen Post and has articles published in many notable publications in the last decade.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.